Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

National News


a27d24 5aa280a6e08e4d02965aec7bc3e2b443 mv2

“Here is a mantra, a short one that I give you. You may imprint it on your hearts and let every breath of yours give expression to it. The mantra is: ‘do or die’. We shall either free India or die in the attempt; we shall not live to see the perpetuation of our slavery,” declared #MahatmaGandhi on 8th August 1942 at Gawalia Tank Maidan, during the Bombay session of #AllIndiaCongress. This was one of the final pushes the country needed to unite against the British and demand for India’s freedom. The Congress also passed a resolution for a civil disobedience movement unless the British completely transferred governance to Indians.

Today as we celebrate the 78th anniversary of the start of the famous revolution #QuitIndiaMovement, let us look back at what caused this revolution, its consequences and all the opposition faced by it.

As we are all well aware, #WorldWar II broke out inn 1935 and then British Governor General of India, Lord Linlithgow wanted Indian soldiers to fight for the British in the war. Indians demanded they would fight in the war only if they were promised complete independence. To negotiate with the leaders, British government sent a mission called Cripps Mission to India. The negotiations failed as the mission did not agree to grant immediate self-rule to India. Post this failure, Gandhi gave a call for #QuitIndiaMovement.

Soon after Gandhi’s inspiring speech, most of the Congress leaders including him, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Abul Kalam Azad were arrested on sedition charges. The #INC was declared unlawful and the jailed leaders were denied a trial. Many homes and offices of Congress leaders were raided. What began as a peaceful movement later turned a little violent as young leader Aruna Asif Ali took charge of the Bombay session and hoisted the national flag at the same Maidan, in spite of stern British warnings. Protest marches and rallies were held countrywide as Gandhi called Indians to act as an independent nation and not follow British orders. Many laid down their lives in the movement as violence broke out at several places and the police lathi charged and fired at the protestors.

The movement also suffered from setbacks, the major one being not receiving enough or no support at all from the #MuslimLeague, #HinduMahasabha, #RashtriyaSwayamSevaksangh (RSS), #CommunistspartyofIndia (CPI), the princely states and from the international front as well. #BRAmbedkar also opposed the movement openly.

a27d24 5f25dd6a6e86458a970c54647f1cc210 mv2
  • The Muslim League, led by #MohammadAliJinnah, did not support the movement as they feared that if the British left India, Muslims would become second class citizens and the majority Hindus would oppress them. They took advantage of the movement which led to the resignation of Congress leaders from provincial legislatures and colluded with the Hindu Mahasabha and the British to take control in Sindh, Bengal and Northwest regions.
  • The Hindu Mahasabha wasn’t in favour of the movement either and were actually openly opposing the Quit India Movement. #VinayakDamodarSavarkar (one of the founders of the body) also wrote a letter titled ‘Stick to your posts’ to all the Hindu Sabha members to remain in their posts in municipalities, local bodies, legislatures or army and other civil services. This directly contradicted Gandhi’s call for mass resignation. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, the Hindu Mahasabha leader of Bengal, also wrote a letter to the British government discussing the movement and how they should respond to it. He was worried that such a movement would create internal disturbances and threaten security during WWII.
  • The RSS, since its inception had kept its distance from the INC. Even during the Quit India Movement, their leader MS Golwalkar decided to maintain it as they did not join the fight. They were in fact praised by the British Government as the Sangh had scrupulously kept itself within the law and refrained from taking part in the August Kranti. The Sangh was never part of the Congress’ freedom movement and such non commitment attracted flak from some of the members of the Sangh itself and also from the Public of India.
  • There was a ban imposed on the Communists Party of India during the period and they needed the ban to be lifted to assist the Soviet Union in their war against the Nazis. Despite many industrial workers offering their support to the movement, the party decided to oppose the movement which eventually led to the lifting of the ban by the British.
  • The Princely states of India also dint provide any support to the movement and funded the opposition, for their own political gains. The nationalists also received very little support from the international front as the US kept changing its alliance to India sometimes and sometimes to #WinstonChurchill. The behaviour of the US wasn’t received well by either Brits or Indians.
a27d24 46bc4593c04c43b2855050ab153668bf mv2

#BRAmbedkar, who was a member of the Viceroy’s executive Council during the time criticised the movement as “both irresponsible and insane, a bankruptcy of statesmanship and a measure to retrieve the Congress prestige that had gone down since the war started. It would be madness, to weaken law and order at a time when the barbarians were at the gates.” By barbarians, he meant the Nazis, the fascist Italy and Japan who were worse than the British. He also said that patriotic duty of Indians was to prevent anarchy and chaos in the country via such movements which would facilitate the subjugation of India by Japan.

One of the major reasons for the failure of the Quit India Movement was the lack of proper leadership at the top to steer the movement in the right direction. While not being united was one of the reasons why we faced a foreign invasion, it didn’t end there and continued through the freedom struggle too. Mahatma Gandhi had hoped that as the British would be more bothered and busier with the war situation and might grant freedom to India if the whole country united and revolted against them, unfortunately that did not happen. Had any one of these leaders, either Jinnah or Savarkar had sided with the movement and extended their support, it maybe could have gained more momentum. There were some rebellion within the INC itself as some of their members dint support the movement. The leaders also lacked a proper plan, structure and a clear goal and especially with the imprisonment of major leaders, the cause was half lost. However, the movement definitely was a milestone in driving British out of India.

– Jahnavi TR

– Bengaluru

References ––IAS

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like


A video showing a baby with redness and cracks has gone viral, naming it ‘alien baby’ and ‘demon child’. The video claims that the...

National News

The CBI conducted investigations at 77 locations spanning 14 states, detaining ten suspects as part of a massive crackdown on online child sex abuse....


The much-awaited Khakee: The Bihar Chapter was released on Netflix on November 25 and since then Chandan Mahto, who is the main antagonist in...


Twenty days after its release, Rishabh Shetty’s ‘Kanatara’ continues to be the first choice for moviegoers. After a thundering response to the Kannada version,...